Three-slot upload
Add your main manuscript as PDF, DOCX, or ODT; upload tables and figures in separate slots. We parse them so tables and figures are reviewed distinctly in the report.
AI-assisted reviewer-style analysis
Before the real referee, we take a look.
More than language polish: AI-assisted academic review, methodology analysis, and up-to-date literature context to improve your submission readiness.
New: after Scenario A review, we can surface journal-fit suggestions (with quartile notes) from our catalog — confirm on each journal site before submitting.
Evaluate your first manuscript free
NO CREDIT CARD REQUIRED — your first review is free. Sign up and upload your manuscript.
~50%
Lower desk-reject risk
~5 min
Typical turnaround
$29
Starting from
Review reportCompleted
80
Publication-readiness score
Methods
85%
Literature
72%
Writing
90%
Statistics
65%
CONSORTPubMedCrossrefSemantic Scholar
NATURE PORTFOLIO
ELSEVIER
SPRINGER NATURE
PUBMED
CROSSREF
SEMANTIC SCHOLAR
CONSORT
STROBE
PRISMA
NATURE PORTFOLIO
ELSEVIER
SPRINGER NATURE
PUBMED
CROSSREF
SEMANTIC SCHOLAR
CONSORT
STROBE
PRISMA
Features
What do we offer?
Aligned with the upload flow: file prep, analysis, and output in one place.
Literature-backed analysis
RAG across PubMed, Crossref, and Semantic Scholar connects your study to current evidence and field context.
Referee-style report and score
Publication-readiness score, axis-based review, and a prioritised action plan — clear pre-submission feedback.
Review or language editing
Choose AI peer-style review or English copy-editing in the same flow; pricing follows the service you pick.
Revisions and external comments
Upload a revision and optionally add journal or referee comments so the analysis matches your context.
Clinical and English-first
The flow is tuned for biomedical work; the main text for review should be in English.
PDF guidance, table and image slots, and a pre-flight checklist — details on the upload page; sign-in is required to continue.
How it works
We are not ChatGPT. We review like a referee.
Using RAG, we ground signals in academic databases and review your manuscript across four dimensions.
1
Upload your manuscript
Upload a PDF or DOCX. You can add tables and figures separately.
2
Literature + AI analysis
PubMed, Crossref, and Semantic Scholar are queried; findings are aligned with peer-review-style criteria.
3
Report and action plan
You get a publication-readiness score, critical fixes, and a clear revision plan.
Journal fit
Where could this manuscript go?
For English biomedical manuscripts, we combine embedding search over an in-house journal catalog with an optional AI re-rank — then attach a structured block to your report (not generic chat guesses).
Catalog + vectors
Journal rows are enriched from public metadata (e.g. Crossref, DOAJ) and embedded into a dedicated Qdrant collection for similarity search.
Discipline-aware retrieval
We infer your field from the review context, apply soft filters, and relax them if the catalog is sparse — so you still get usable shortlists.
Report + export
Suggestions appear in the web report and exports (DOCX / PDF) with conservative wording: always verify aims, scope, and reporting guidelines yourself.
Pricing
One review quality
Every paid manuscript gets the same full peer-review pipeline. Price scales with word count and workload (including PDF as the main file), not feature tiers.
Short manuscript
Up to 3,000 words
From $29 USD
Same full review for every band
- Shorter body; usually fewer tables, figures, and extra materials.
- Statistical workload tends to be lighter—focus stays on the core narrative.
- Higher bands reflect size and workload, not unlocking extra product features.
- Turnaround depth matches this word band and typical file weight.
Medium manuscript
3,001 – 5,000 words
From $45 USD
Same full review for every band
- Mid-length text; more sections and often more tables or figures.
- More pages and visuals increase extraction, reading, and cross-check time.
- As methods or results expand, statistical review load rises naturally.
- Quotes follow size and complexity—not a feature ladder between tiers.
Long manuscript
5,001+ words
From $59 USD
Same full review for every band
- Long papers; many references, dense supplements, and heavy tables.
- Lots of figures or dense numeric displays increase processing time.
- PDF as the primary manuscript adds a flat +$5 USD fee in the quote summary.
- Same product scope; price scales with volume and complexity.
English language editing
Standalone service — choose it at upload instead of peer review. Same word bands as review; fixed USD pricing.
From $15 USD
- Up to 3,000 words · $15
- 3,001 – 5,000 words · $24
- 5,001+ words · $32
- PDF manuscript +$5 USD
How we compare
AI pre-review vs. traditional editing services
Built for researchers who need a reviewer-style report fast — not a 7-day manual rewrite.
Review My Manuscript
$15 – $70
5–15 minutes
- Reviewer-style report (methodology, statistics, structure)
- RAG-grounded literature & journal-fit suggestions
- Quote first, pay only if you accept — no subscription
- Failed pipeline → automatic refund
Paperpal (Manuscript Check)
~$19 / month
Instant
- AI grammar + language suggestions
- Submission-readiness check (basic)
- No deep methodology / statistics audit
- Subscription-only, per-seat pricing
Trinka AI (Manuscript Plus)
~$20 / month
Instant
- Academic grammar + plagiarism scan
- Journal-fit & consistency checks
- No reviewer-style structural critique
- Subscription gating, limited free tier
Reviewer3 (AI Peer Review)
$19 one-time / $29 mo
~10 minutes
- AI integrity & validity triage
- Free tier for early drafts
- Light on journal-fit & literature context
- Limited for high-stakes selective journals
Enago (Substantive Edit)
$300 – $700+
5–7 business days
- Human editor language polish
- Manuscript-level rewrite
- No reviewer-style methodology analysis
- Slower turnaround, higher cost
Editage (Premium Edit)
$250 – $650+
5–10 business days
- Human editor copyediting
- Language and grammar focus
- No automated stats or structure audit
- Subscription / package upsells
Competitor prices are illustrative public quotes (2026) and may vary by manuscript length, package, and region. Compare current quotes directly on each provider's site.
Testimonials
What researchers say
"
The pre-submission report flagged a statistical issue our internal reviewers missed. Saved us from a desk reject.
RF
Cardiology research fellow
University teaching hospital
"
The methodology feedback was granular — it read like a real reviewer's report. The literature context section was the most useful part for our team.
PR
Postdoctoral researcher
Neuroscience, R1 university
"
The journal-fit suggestion saved us months — we re-submitted to a better-fit Q2 instead of chasing a Q1 with the wrong scope.
SR
Senior researcher
Clinical oncology
FAQ
Common questions
Before you submit to a journal, it provides AI-assisted, reviewer-style assessment and reports methodological and literature-related risks.
Guides
Academic resources
Clean UI, strong content: the four most important guides are highlighted first.
Why do papers get rejected?
Common editor and reviewer reasons for rejection—and how to lower your risk.
Read articleWhat is a desk reject?
A critical checklist so your manuscript reaches peer review.
Read articleWhat does major revision mean?
How to manage a major revision decision and structure your response.
Read articleYour peer-review report arrived—what next?
A step-by-step plan to revise without common mistakes.
Read article