Peer review
What Should a Strong Response to Reviewers Do?
A strong response letter is not written to argue with reviewers—it is written to answer every comment respectfully, clearly, and specifically. The goal is to show the editor and reviewers that comments were taken seriously, necessary revisions were made, and the manuscript improved in concrete ways.
Key components
| Section | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Respectful Opening | Thanks reviewers and the editor; sets a professional tone. |
| Point-by-Point Structure | Addresses each reviewer comment separately. |
| Direct Response | Answers the core concern instead of deflecting. |
| Specific Revisions | Explains exactly what changed in the manuscript. |
| Tracked Location | Gives page and line numbers so revisions are easy to verify. |
| Evidence-Based Justification | Uses data, rationale, or citations when needed. |
| Polite Disagreement | Explains respectful disagreement without sounding defensive. |
| Clarity and Transparency | Makes it easy for editors and reviewers to follow changes. |
| Professional Closing | Ends with a concise, courteous sign-off. |
Weak vs strong response letters
Weak response letters
- Ignore or merge reviewer comments
- Use a defensive or emotional tone
- Give vague answers
- Fail to state what changed
- Omit page or line references
- Say “we fixed it” without showing how
Strong response letters
- Answer every comment separately and clearly
- Stay polite, calm, and professional
- Explain revisions concretely
- Justify with literature or data when needed
- Point to page and line numbers
- Express respectful disagreement when appropriate
Recommended response format
Use this structure for each reviewer comment:
Reviewer 1 – Comment 1: [Insert the reviewer's comment here.] Response: We thank the reviewer for this important comment. We have revised the manuscript to clarify this point... Change made in the manuscript: This information has been added to the Methods section, page X, lines Y–Z.
Core message
A strong response letter should answer:
- What exactly was the reviewer's comment?
- How did we respond to it?
- What did we change in the manuscript?
- Where was the change made?
- If no change was made, what is the rationale?
In short
A strong response to reviewers does not argue emotionally—it answers every comment clearly, respectfully, and specifically.
For steps after you receive comments, see our peer review report guide — or run a pre-submission review to surface risks before revision.
See reviewer-style risks before you submit
Reduce revision stress—catch weak points before the response letter stage.
Evaluate your manuscript